![]() In the meantime, Chutkan has ordered a pause to the proceedings while the appeal plays out. The newspaper is a public trust dedicated to the pursuit of truth and reason covering a range of issues from breaking news to politics, business, the markets, the arts, sports and community to the. The Washington-based federal appeals court last week granted prosecutors’ request to expedite consideration of Trump’s appeal. Trump’s team is scheduled to respond to that request in a legal brief on Wednesday. Supreme Court to take up and rule quickly on a Trump appeal claiming that he is immune from prosecution as a former president. FILE - Meta’s logo is seen on a sign at the company’s headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., Nov. The gag order issue is one of multiple pending court challenges ahead of Trump’s election subversion trial, which is currently scheduled for March 4. Subscribe Nation Prime Sent daily with links to our latest premium stories. This includes politics, business, Africa and world updates. Top Kenyan newspaper headlines: Photos/screengrab: Daily Nation, People Daily, The Standard, The Star and Taifa Leo. The panel said that though he could make general comments about known or foreseeable witnesses, he could not directly attack them over their involvement in the case or about the content of their expected testimony. Breaking News Sent daily with an update of the latest breaking news. Latest breaking business news, updates and analysis on companies, finance and markets, agriculture, enterprise, currency and more from Kenya and Africa. ![]() Circuit affirmed the gag order but modified it in important ways, freeing Trump to publicly criticize Smith. District Judge Tanya Chutkan in October in response to concerns from special counsel Jack Smith’s team that Trump’s pattern of incendiary comments could taint the proceedings, intimidate witnesses and influence jurors.Ī three-judge panel of the U.S. “This petition presents a question of exceptional importance: Whether a district court may gag the core political speech of the leading candidate for President of the United States-disregarding the First Amendment rights of over 100 million American voters-based on speculation about undefined possible future harms to the judicial process,” the lawyers wrote.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |